Archive

Archive for the ‘Reviews’ Category

Sweeney Todd: does it make the cut?

“The demon barber of Fleet…Street.”

Blood, sweat, tears and more blood; the preview of Sweeney Todd at CFT (Chichester Festival Theatre) was a cut above the rest (24th September 2011). The cast gave a bloody account of the gloomy tale of a man fuelled by loss and grief and driven to madness. The final scene reflected the successful retelling with the audience repaying the actors hard work with a standing ovation.

The two lead characters played by Michael Ball (Sweeney Todd) and Imelda Staunton (Mrs Lovett); beautifully recreated the dark tale. Ball gave phenomenal singing performances (solo and duets) and the powerful projection of his voice created an eerie atmosphere in the city of London. At times Ball’s body language lacked the emotion of Mr Todd seen in previous performances (such as the renowned Mr Johnny Depp). At times Ball looked like a young Ricky Gervais in The Office which made his role less effective and daunting however his performance of Mr Todd was energetic at all times.

The sharpest performance of the night was from Imelda Staunton. Staunton’s quick pace delivery of modern jokes and witty lines left the audience in upheavals of raucous laughter. Staunton embraced the character of Mrs Lovett without doubt and the best scene of the night was between her and Mr Todd. What type of pie would you like? This scene showcased the flawless acting by Staunton; humorous descriptions of the ‘types of people in the pies’ with modern references and puns: bankers, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, the army and many more relatable professions.

The set was enticing, exciting and elaborate. The main scenes made brilliant use of a winding staircase and balconies overlooking the main stage. To change from various locations a two levelled staircase set would transport the audience: from the barber shop to the asylum to the Judge’s house and so on. The costumes were low cost reflecting the era of the story but none the less, very captivating.

The production managed to stir various emotions throughout the evening: Mr Todd’s anxious nature to seek revenge, Todd’s daughter Johanna’s despair, Mrs Lovett’s obsession with Mr Todd, Judge Turpin’s sick perversion with his daughter and the seeded events that occurred in London and went unnoticed.

Judge Turpin played by John Bowe created a startling scene that really put the audience under the knife: a ritualistic whipping scene with Turpin using his belt as an instrument of pain on his body whilst dressed only in trousers. Turpin numerously beat himself to drive the incestual thoughts for his daughter away. The scene was a little cringe worthy yet effective as it portrayed the dark sick nature of judge Turpin and the cracking of the leather belt on his skin brought the reality to the audience. Crack.

The daughter Johanna was played well by Lucy Barker as she triumphantly showed the audience her angelic nature yet also her fight for survival. Although one of the first scenes showed an explicit silhouette denoting rape that seemed unnecessary; the rest of the production followed her tale of escaping the terror of her father and without knowledge being in the same location as her mother.

The true horror the audience loved was the ‘close shaves’ of many men under the knife of Mr Todd; all but one that resulted every time in death. Thrills, shrieks and cries were provoked by the humorous deaths in the barber shop. Mr Todd without mercy slit the throats of customers and simply disposed of their bodies to the bake house below. The scene beautifully showed the rhythmic ease of killing the men and then using their bodies as filling for the meat pies. The squirting of blood with each kill was a fantastic effect; simple, slaughtered yet effective.

The show was slick with excellent choreography for all of the songs and the crossover of two scenes at one time was timed well. The cast remained full of energy throughout the whole performance and kept the atmosphere of London very much alive and buzzing: a stark contrast to customers at Mr Todd’s barbers. The audience remained enthralled in the two and half hour tale of violence, madness, grief, deceit and loss. Sweeney Todd is being performed at CFT until Saturday 5th November 2011 and is a must see! You’d be bloody mad not to.

The Passage, Justin Cronin

The Passage by Justin Cronin is a gripping post apocalyptic novel that you have to read this summer. The military believe they can engineer and train a new breed of soldiers whom are indestructible. By testing the virus on twelve inmates on death row, the military try to achieve their dream.

However, the dream turns into a nightmare with the twelve subjects, virals, escaping, killing and destroying the world.

The world before the virus.

Blood sucking vampires (virals), Amy, an FBI agent, a nun, the army, survivors. The array of characters keeps you interested and the characters lives soon cross over as the plot unravels. One of the main character Amy, a young girl of six years old, is the enigma of the novel: she
has telepathic abilities, can communicate with the virals and is actually over one hundred years. You are constantly questioning her being: what is she? What are her powers?

The novel explores a range of emotions: courage, loss, faith and a human’s fight for survival. Cronin beautifully describes the fear felt by the characters when facing the hungry and crazed virals. The scenes are well written with gruesome and gritty details guaranteed to make you squirm!

The novel’s ending is does not offer a resolution, however, this is deliberate as Cronin is creating a trilogy: The Passage, The Twelve and The City of Mirrors. Visit Amazon to get your hands on this epic novel!

A sucker for True Blood

At University many students spend endless hours revising, researching and working hard sweating blood and tears to complete essays and meet tight deadlines. However as pressure mounts and deadlines edge that bit closer we all need to relax, escape and let our minds wander. This year (academic) I have escaped in a truly ‘fangtastic’ world called True Blood. Please excuse the playful language as it is merely distracting and reducing my review of True Blood already, but I feel it is needed to express the sheer enjoyment received from watching this programme. In three months I have indulged in all three series with (twelve episodes in each).

I know what you’re thinking. Am I a student who simply spends their time, energy and money viewing television programmes with square eyes?  No. Prior to True Blood I have never been interested or bothered nor addicted or a ‘fan’ of a particular show. However over the past few months I have become, to put it mildly, obsessed with True Blood. I have become an observant and critical media student appreciating an addictive yet clever series. Without writing an analytical essay on this series it can be recognised that the creator, Alan Ball has used codes and conventions effectively alongside a range of genres to attract the largest target audience. It has successfully stole my attention, can it steal yours?

The series (three, so far) are based on the books written by Charlaine Harris offering a raunchier, sexier version of vampires and a magical world. True Blood offers you shocking things you have never seen before and it is not for the faint hearted or the young.

Set in a fictional town, Bon Temps, Sookie Stackhouse (a waitress) discovers a new world of creatures when she falls in love with Bill Compton a vampire. Unlike other vampire stories such as Twilight, vampires are not a secret but are governed by laws just like humans, this adds to the tension when committing crimes throughout the series such as killing another vampire or a recurrent storyline draining a vampire for v (vampire blood). The vampire blood is very powerful with the ability to heal those who are wounded or nearly dying whilst also creating fantasy worlds for couples. Vampires are persuaded to drink Tru Blood- synthetic blood instead of killing humans. However you may find throughout the series this does not always satisfy even the “nicest” vampires.

The series offers a sexy insight into the world of humans and creatures, whilst an attractive cast offers pleasure for both male and female viewers. The main character Sookie Stackhouse is innocently portrayed with delicate beauty: a slim attractive blonde girl who  in the first few episodes (constantly) refers to her ‘virginity’. None the less her characteristics are sweet and endearing.

The creatures (vampires and werewolves) are attractive in appearance and the female vampires, especially, offer a raunchiness, darkness and lust. With their beautiful complexions, dazzling dress sense and unique characters (with different personalities) you cannot help but fall in love with the cast. Careful you don’t fall for a vampire, you may get used to the term fang-banger!

Each episode covers a variety of issues, dilemmas and problems. The storylines are tense, captivating and full of emotion keeping you glued to the screen or seat. Most of the scenes are very graphic and therefore the series is devoted to a young adult audience capable of being exposed to sexually explicit scenes and topics covering homosexuality, rape, lust, magic and pain. The episodes are fast paced and gripping and through the series you learn of betrayal, heartache and treachery. Needless to say you will hooked.

So what makes it different, more exciting and more enjoyable than any other vampire series we have watched or heard of before? Well I have asked myself that very question and it cannot be summarised in one lexeme. The programme offers viewers a believable world full of creatures, daring storylines which expose our instinctive animalistic traits, scenes heavily evoking sexual emotion, tension and seducing viewers subconsciously into the world of True Blood. Fans of the programme are eagerly anticipating the new storylines and twists in the fourth series, expected to be released summer 2011. So if I haven’t convinced you, try two episodes of True Blood and believe me you will be wanting more. Another bite. Only the true stuff (a joke- only to be understood by fans)…

In a culturally creative world with works such as Twilight, Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings, True Blood successfully earns credibility and captures the imagination whilst being based in a realistic world with many believable concepts and laws. It is sexy, enticing and most of all addictive. Although some people snigger and mock ‘fantasy works’ True Blood remains sophisticated and real and one definitely not to be missed. It captures love, pain, action and adventure whilst exploring the realms of magic, vampires, fairies, witches, shape shifter, werewolves and fairies (hopefully more in the fourth series).

To True Blood fans that cannot wait for the fourth series here is a sneaky ‘tease trailer’ and no doubt when we are able to enjoy the pleasures of the fourth installment Twitter will be chaotic with conversations. To those not converted yet (to the series that is), watch a few episodes and see what happens…

Related articles

Channel four- True Blood

HBO: True Blood forum

Eastenders: storyline beyond belief?

Do we want to watch cot death and baby snatching on our television screens? Is that entertainment? With over 6000 complaints, has Eastenders gone too far?

The storyline that has caught the attention of thousands has caused uproar, fury and upset. Ronnie Mitchell and Kat Moon having given birth to baby boys within hours of each other. Little James Ronnie’s son dies from cot death and whilst wandering in the Square for help, she hears Tommy crying upstairs in The Queen Vic: she swaps her dead baby for Kat and Alfie Moon’s baby Tommy. Wow. Let me catch my breath. I did just say that two babies were born, one died and then they got switched. Sorry for any bluntness that may have caused offence. Did the scriptwriters think about the repercussions of this storyline?

Life and death are sensitive issues not to be taken lightly, in jest or to be ridiculed. In the case of child deaths our media, over the past few years, has been bombarded with children being abducted, abused or dying. Therefore this storyline caused outrage amongst many who found it offensive, disrespectful and all in all insensitive.

However, soaps are not meant to represent reality. They offer escapism, pleasure and food for thought. Theorists have argued that soaps tackle issues that we like to hide from society that do not fit into the “normal” family structure that people aspire to create in their lives.

The actress Samantha Womack (who plays Ronnie) is reported to be leaving the show and one of the reasons is the horrific storyline. The programme-makers already made last minute edits to the New Year’s Eve episode: a scene showing Ronnie touching the cold hand of her dead baby and Kat (in blood-soaked pyjamas) after Alfie Moon (her husband) finds her haemorrhaging in her bed.

The character Ronnie has suffered immensely throughout her character’s life: abused and raped by her father, having a baby when she was a teenager and her father led her to believe the baby was dead. Evidently many people have felt that this is a step too far for the character and completely over the top. Discussions have been raised about the believability: would you recognise your own baby? In addition most people feel this is the wrong time for such a tragic storyline. Christmas and New Year should be a joyous time and promoting self fulfilment for the year ahead, instead we find soaps competing for the craziest and most eccentric storyline. Is this the sad state of Britain’s soaps? Or is it a harsh portrayal of difficult issues? With the exception that baby swapping (in our culture and society) is very rare.

The last storyline in Eastenders to cause such a stir was only back in April 2009 when Danielle Jones (Ronnie’s daughter) was killed in a car crash. Is this the response of audiences saying enough is enough? How far will television producers and writers go to entertain the public? Is the BBC really conforming to the PSB format? Instead of seizing the opportunity to create happy memories with two strong, independent women in the script entering motherhood after storylines of tragedy and pain, Eastenders took the wrong turn. Through this controversial decision they have probably lost loyal fans as they have simply found the storyline too upsetting and devastating. The insensitive coverage of losing a baby did not consider viewers who have experienced this tragedy and underestimated the emotional trauma it has caused: who in their right mind would even contemplate swapping a dead baby for someone else’s living baby? Eastenders in the past has tackled issues in a thoughtful and responsible manner (story line) considering ethical, emotional and personal problems. Has the focus this time been too much on causing shock and gaining the highest ratings over the Christmas period? What do you think? Dun dun dun dun dunnnnnnn…..

The X factor vs. high culture

The X factor has only just finished and our papers are filled with this years winner, Matt Cardle crowned on 12th December 2010. You may also have read articles about other winners from popular television shows: Strictly Come Dancing winner Kara Tointon and I’m a celebrity get me out of here, Stacey Solomon are a few seen in todays newspapers.

So what do we make of all this madness? Is popular television affecting the nation?

Radio 4 aired a thought-provoking debate on high art vs popular culture, 15th December 2010. Michael Buerk hosted the programme along with an intellectual panel: Matthew Taylor, Claire Fox, Clifford Longley and Michael Portillo.

The programme offered a variety of points of views about X factor and the effect shows such as these have on our nation and culture. However with only a forty-five minute programme, areas being discussed were limited. These are a few of the opinions and points raised on the programme:

  • Attacks on X factor are against chavs and the ‘stereotyped’ people and does not pose as a threat to society.
  • Critical opinion “music has a moral value…precious in the world” and a programme such as X factor can be considered culturally offensive.
  • Simon Cowell is strongly responsible for reducing music to homogeneity and thus being counter-educational.
  • Should the X factor be taken seriously?
  • Has celebrity culture taken over different parts of our culture? This question could not be elaborated as the subject is too great for the shows allowed time.
  • Does the show contain ‘talented’ musicians? Just because the formula of X factor has appealed to the mass audience showing its success that does not prove they are extremely talented but simply the manipulation of the media is at play. This success can be compared to the popularity of McDonalds restaurants, just because millions of people consume the produce does not necessarily mean it is of high quality, or the ‘best restaurant’.
  • People on the X factor are ‘puppets on a string’.
  • The culture in the 21st century is consumed differently to previous times. We are not cultural dopes we are active audiences (theorist Stuart Hall), look at Twitter on a Saturday night. This is a fast-moving medium sharing the nations opinions.
  • The celebrity culture is dominating our lives. The beginning of X factor provides an insight into the contestant’s personalities and lives. Celebrities dominate the best-selling books in our charts.
  • The beginning of X factor (30 seconds) plays classical music in the opening. Is the X factor a gateway to more music?
  • Some people on the X factor are simply being humiliated for entertainment. Is this morally right? However, for some contestants they may enjoy the ‘one off’ experience however for many this will not be enjoyable.
  • Passive viewers feel they have ultimate control over the outcome of the competition. Is this right?

The show offered a range of views to entertain the reader however the arguments were too broad and due to the limited time they could not be expanded fully. The X factor by active readers can be viewed as entertainment, escapism or useful in the context it is consumed. For example, a sociable evening with friends eating a takeaway. However are these popular programmes offering culture. Culture adds to (our) beliefs, values and personalities, and is a show such as the X factor doing so in a positive way? Are we able to see this programme as beneficial? Art and culture should be able to challenge and stimulate a viewer (exercise the human mind) and should not be based on popularity.

Perhaps our attention should be focused on the content and quality of the art culture in our society: do we need more writers? More true musicians? Listening to the programme alongside others sparked further discussions. Has television been dumbed down? Blaming the X factor is not necessarily the answer for the collapse of culture and civilisation but it may be the alert needed to lead our society to a culturally appreciative world.

Related articles

Rewind Radio: Moral Maze; Chris Evans; Cheque Book and Pen

BBC 4 Message board

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 286 other followers